🔗 Share this article

The true crime genre has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of headlights or torches as the police arrive, their expressions and tones expressing wariness or panic or indignation or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we frequently incidentally glimpse the faces of the law enforcement personnel, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what sometimes seems like extraordinary diffidence – though perhaps this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have previously seen the Netflix real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the grim case of Ajike Owens in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids reportedly bothered and antagonized her white neighbour, a local resident. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when the victim went to the neighbor's residence to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The arresting officers found evidence that Lorincz had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit householders and others to use firearms if there is a significant presumption of threat. The documentary constructs its narrative with the officer recordings captured during the repeated police visits to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of the caller contacting authorities in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also police cell footage of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really suggest anything too complex about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her a derogatory term, an hurtful taunt. The production is showcased as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking bloodshed. But the reality of firearm possession and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit notoriously said made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how minimal concern the officers took in this aspect. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? How was the gun kept in her home? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is gun ownership so normal it would be like asking about microwaves or bread heaters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what seemed to her neighbors a extended period, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another parallel, incidentally, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an extraordinary sequence in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the handcuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point led her to think that this could be effective?

Conclusion and Verdict

It didn’t; and the jury’s verdict is revealed in the closing credits. A very sombre picture of American crime and punishment.